glp1ledger

Tirzepatide vs Semaglutide: The One Trial That Compared Them Directly

SURMOUNT-5 randomised 751 adults to one drug or the other and measured them at 72 weeks. Tirzepatide won by 6.5 percentage points. This page reports that result and the four features of the trial that decide how much it is worth.

The glp1ledger editorial team · Published 2026-09-06

For four years the honest answer to "which one works better" was that nobody had measured it. Semaglutide had its trials, tirzepatide had its trials, and the two sets of numbers were not comparable to each other. That changed in May 2025, when SURMOUNT-5 was published: 751 adults with obesity and without diabetes, randomly assigned to one drug or the other, weighed at 72 weeks.

This page reports what that trial found and, in the same detail, what about its design limits the finding. It does not say which medicine anyone should take — that belongs with a prescriber, for the reasons our editorial standards set out. Our cost page carries the current prices for both drugs, and our retatrutide vs tirzepatide page covers the molecule that is being lined up behind them.

The head-to-head result

SURMOUNT-5 was a phase 3b trial run by Eli Lilly (NCT05822830). Adults with obesity but without type 2 diabetes were randomised 1:1 to the maximum tolerated dose of tirzepatide (10 mg or 15 mg) or the maximum tolerated dose of semaglutide (1.7 mg or 2.4 mg), injected once weekly for 72 weeks. The primary endpoint was percent change in weight.

Endpoint at week 72 Tirzepatide Semaglutide
Mean weight change −20.2% (95% CI −21.4 to −19.1) −13.7% (95% CI −14.9 to −12.6)
Mean waist-circumference change −18.4 cm (95% CI −19.6 to −17.2) −13.0 cm (95% CI −14.3 to −11.7)
Reached −10%, −15%, −20%, −25% More likely, at each threshold Reference
Most common adverse events Gastrointestinal, mostly mild to moderate, mostly during escalation Gastrointestinal, mostly mild to moderate, mostly during escalation

Both differences were significant at P<0.001 (Aronne et al., N Engl J Med 2025;393:26-36). That is the result, and it is the result almost every article about these two drugs now cites.

Four things about the trial that decide what the result is worth

Nothing below claims the trial was wrong. Each item is a design fact stated in the paper itself, and each one changes how far a 6.5-percentage-point gap should be carried.

It was open-label. Every participant and investigator knew which drug was in the pen. The two medicines use different devices on different escalation schedules, so blinding would have meant dummy injections in both arms; the trial did not do that. Weight-loss outcomes depend heavily on what participants do between visits, and expectation is not a neutral input.

It was funded by one side. Lilly makes tirzepatide, designed and paid for the trial, and eight of the twelve named authors are Lilly employees. Industry funding does not make a result false — SURMOUNT-5 is the only randomised comparison that exists, and it would not exist otherwise — but a reader is entitled to know that the drug that won was the sponsor's.

The comparator arm could finish below the approved dose. Both arms were titrated to the maximum dose the participant tolerated. For tirzepatide that meant 10 mg or 15 mg, both approved maintenance doses. For semaglutide it meant 1.7 mg or 2.4 mg — and 1.7 mg is an escalation step, not the 2.4 mg dose approved for weight management. The design is defensible as a picture of real prescribing, where not everyone reaches the top dose. It is not the same trial as one comparing 15 mg with 2.4 mg.

It is one trial of 751 people. SURMOUNT-1 enrolled 2,539 and STEP 1 enrolled 1,961. A single head-to-head of this size settles the direction of the difference much better than it settles its size. Peer correspondence followed: three letters, from Leiden University Medical Center and from GFO Clinics Troisdorf, were published with the authors' reply in N Engl J Med 2025;393(16):1654-1656.

What each drug did against placebo

These are the trials that established each medicine. They are listed here for context, and they are not comparable to each other — different years, populations, durations and estimands.

Trial Drug Participants Duration Mean weight change Placebo
STEP 1 Semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly 1,961 68 weeks −14.9% −2.4%
SURMOUNT-1 Tirzepatide 5 / 10 / 15 mg weekly 2,539 72 weeks −15.0% / −19.5% / −20.9% −3.1%

In STEP 1, 86.4% of the semaglutide group lost at least 5% of body weight, 69.1% lost at least 10% and 50.5% lost at least 15%, against 31.5%, 12.0% and 4.9% on placebo (Wilding et al., N Engl J Med 2021;384:989-1002). Discontinuation for gastrointestinal events was 4.5% on semaglutide and 0.8% on placebo.

What separates them apart from the numbers

Receptors. Semaglutide is a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Tirzepatide activates the GIP receptor as well. Whether that second receptor is the reason for the difference in SURMOUNT-5 is not established by SURMOUNT-5, which measured weight, not mechanism.

Formulations. Both are once-weekly injections for weight management, sold as Wegovy and Zepbound. Semaglutide now also exists as a daily tablet: FDA approved Wegovy tablets under NDA 218316 on 2025-12-22, and the trial behind it, OASIS 4, reported −13.6% at 64 weeks in 205 people on 25 mg. Tirzepatide has no oral form — the tablet competing with it is a different molecule again, orforglipron, which we compare with tirzepatide on its own page. Our GLP-1 pills page covers both oral options and their prices.

Price. Read from the manufacturers on 2026-09-06:

Self-pay price per month
Zepbound 2.5 mg / 5 mg / 7.5–15 mg $299 / $399 / $449
Wegovy pen, most doses $349 ($199 for a new patient's first two fills)
Wegovy pill 1.5 mg / 4 mg / 9 mg and 25 mg $149 / $199 / $299

Both manufacturers advertise commercial-insurance savings cards at "as little as $25" a month with caps. The cost hub keeps the full table, including Medicare terms, with the date each figure was read.

What we would want next

A blinded trial comparing 15 mg of tirzepatide with 2.4 mg of semaglutide, run by neither manufacturer, reporting outcomes past 72 weeks. Nobody has announced one. Until then the honest summary is narrow: in one open-label, industry-funded, maximum-tolerated-dose trial of 751 people, tirzepatide produced more weight loss than semaglutide at 72 weeks, and the direction of that finding is better supported than its exact size.

Sources

  • Aronne LJ et al. Tirzepatide as Compared with Semaglutide for the Treatment of Obesity. N Engl J Med 2025;393(1):26-36. PubMed 40353578 · NCT05822830
  • Correspondence on SURMOUNT-5, N Engl J Med 2025;393(16):1654-1656. PubMed 41124642, 41124643, 41124644
  • Wilding JPH et al. Once-Weekly Semaglutide in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. N Engl J Med 2021;384(11):989-1002. PubMed 33567185
  • Wharton S et al. Oral Semaglutide at a Dose of 25 mg in Adults with Overweight or Obesity. N Engl J Med 2025;393(11):1077-1087. PubMed 40934115
  • Manufacturer self-pay prices, read 2026-09-06: NovoCare Wegovy savings and Lilly's Zepbound coverage page, as recorded on our cost hub.
  • FDA approval records via the openFDA Drugs@FDA API, read 2026-09-06 (Wegovy tablets, NDA 218316, original approval 2025-12-22).

Frequently asked questions

Is tirzepatide better than semaglutide for weight loss?

In the one trial that randomised people to one drug or the other, it produced more weight loss: −20.2% against −13.7% at 72 weeks in 751 adults with obesity and without diabetes (SURMOUNT-5). That is a 6.5-percentage-point difference and it was statistically significant. Three features of the trial qualify how far the number travels: it was open-label, so nobody was blinded; it was funded by tirzepatide's manufacturer; and the semaglutide arm was titrated to the maximum tolerated dose, which for some participants was 1.7 mg rather than the 2.4 mg approved for weight management. Whether either drug suits a particular person is a clinical question, not one a trial average answers.

How much weight do people lose on tirzepatide versus semaglutide?

Head to head over 72 weeks, mean losses were 20.2% of body weight on tirzepatide and 13.7% on semaglutide. In their own placebo-controlled trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg gave a mean 14.9% over 68 weeks (STEP 1) and tirzepatide gave 15.0%, 19.5% and 20.9% at its three doses over 72 weeks (SURMOUNT-1). Those two trials cannot be subtracted from each other — different years, different populations, different lengths, different ways of counting people who stopped — which is exactly why SURMOUNT-5 was run.

Why was SURMOUNT-5 open-label, and does it matter?

The two drugs are given with different devices on different schedules, so blinding would have required dummy injections in both arms. The trial instead let everyone know what they were receiving. It matters because weight-loss trials depend on participant behaviour — diet, activity, persistence through dose escalation — and knowing you are on the drug reported as stronger is a plausible influence on all three. The size of any such effect is unknown; it is a reason to treat the 6.5-point gap as an estimate with a soft edge rather than a fixed quantity.

What is the difference between tirzepatide and semaglutide?

Semaglutide activates one receptor, GLP-1. Tirzepatide activates two, GIP and GLP-1, which is why it is called a dual agonist. Both are once-weekly injections. Semaglutide is sold as Wegovy for weight management and Ozempic for type 2 diabetes, and since December 2025 also as a Wegovy tablet; tirzepatide is sold as Zepbound for weight management and Mounjaro for type 2 diabetes. Whether the second receptor explains the difference in the trial is not established — SURMOUNT-5 measured an outcome, not a mechanism.

Which is cheaper, Zepbound or Wegovy?

On 2026-09-06 the manufacturers' self-pay prices were $299 to $449 a month for Zepbound depending on dose, and $349 a month for the Wegovy pen at most doses, dropping to $199 for a new patient's first two fills. The cheapest semaglutide is the tablet at $149 a month for 1.5 mg, rising to $299 at 9 mg and 25 mg. So the starting doses of semaglutide are cheaper and the maintenance doses are close. These are cash prices from the manufacturers; what an insured patient pays depends on the plan, and the savings cards for both drugs advertise as little as $25 a month with caps.

Do the side effects differ between the two drugs?

In SURMOUNT-5 the most common adverse events in both groups were gastrointestinal, and in both groups most were mild to moderate and occurred mainly during dose escalation — the trial reports the same qualitative picture for each drug rather than a difference between them. Both carry the class boxed warning about thyroid C-cell tumours seen in rodents. Anyone weighing tolerability should read the two labels with a prescriber; a trial's adverse-event table describes a selected population followed under protocol, not an individual's experience.